Grain levels in English path curvature descriptions and accompanying iconic gestures

This paper confirms that the English verb system (similar to the Finnish, Dutch and Bulgarian verb systems [22], [17]) represents path curvature at three different grain levels: neutral path curvature, global path curvature and local path curvature. We show that the three-grain-level hypothesis makes it possible to formulate constraints on English sentence structure and makes it possible to define constructions in English that refer to path curvature. We furthermore demonstrate in an experiment that the proposed English lexicalization pattern regarding path curvature in tandem with the spatial information shown to English speakers correctly predicts their packaging of grain levels in iconic gestures. We conclude that the data studied confirm Nikanne and Van der Zee’s *22] three-grain-level hypothesis in relation to English and Kita and Özyürek’s [11] Interface Hypothesis in relation to gesture production

Grain levels in English path curvature descriptions and accompanying iconic gestures

This paper confirms that the English verb system (similar to the Finnish, Dutch, and Bulgarian verb systems) represents path curvature at three different grain levels: neutral path curvature, global path curvature, and local path curvature. We show that the three-grain-level hypothesis makes it possible to formulate constraints on English sentence structure and makes it possible to define constructions in English that refer to path curvature. We furthermore demonstrate in an experiment that the proposed English lexicalization pattern regarding path curvature in tandem with the spatial information shown to English speakers correctly predicts their packaging of grain levels in iconic gestures. We conclude that the data studied confirm Nikanne and Van der Zee\u27s three-grain-level hypothesis in relation to English and Kita and Ozyurek’s interface hypothesis in relation to gesture production

Show your hands — Are you really clever? Reasoning, gesture production, and intelligence

This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.This study investigates the relationship of reasoning and gesture production in individuals differing in fluid and crystallized intelligence. It combines mea-sures of speed and accuracy of processing geometric analogies with analyses of spontaneous hand gestures that accompanied young adults’ subsequent ex-planations of how they solved the geometric analogy task. Individuals with superior fluid intelligence processed the analogies more efficiently than par-ticipants with average fluid intelligence. Additionally, they accompanied their subsequent explanations with more gestures expressing movement in non- egocentric perspective. Furthermore, gesturing (but not speaking) about the most relevant aspect of the task was related to higher fluid intelligence. Within the gestures-as-simulated action framework, the results suggest that i ndividuals with superior fluid intelligence engage more in mental simulation during vi-sual imagery than those with average fluid intelligence. The findings stress the relationship between gesture production and general cognition, such as fluid intelligence, rather than its relationship to language. The role of gesture pro-duction in thinking and learning processes is discussed.Peer Reviewe